Because if you put 1 Nina Lambert with some of the biggest spenders in the game then you pretty much kill off the game. A fully maxed / rebirthed Nina would be OP compared to anything else out there. She could and would be used for any position you want since she is 5k/5k/5k at base talents. They really should just remove Nina from the game completely or at least remove her from the option for players to get her.
I would prefer there to be a better balance between P2P and F2P but giving out Nina is only going to benefit P2P and there would be no chance for the F2P to compete.
again only thinking of "big spenders".....really the "big spenders" have alot of heros right?..... for example there are a few that have 9 RB2 heros that can hold 250k troops thats 2.2mil troop capacity. the troops alone kill the game.
so your way of thinking is those that arent "big spenders" shouldnt have a chance....let the big spenders control the game and only think about what bad could happen.
im not a big spender but i bet that if you had just a RB2 Nina against me i would win.
but yeah when is there battles (other than friendlies setting them up) where there is only 1 hero attacking?
every battle and war i have seen is everyone throwing everything they have into the battle.....but Nina is "too powerful" for non spenders to have a chance at.
btw i can go on for days on this topic.........try thinking of players other than "big spenders" and you will see my logic.