CJcarbon1 wrote:

jotasnake wrote: You can't use the word "issue" when its just your opinion on a matter.   LOL! I am hereby placing a formal request for a certified true copy of AG&E's "Allowable Use Of The English Language" document, complete with all relevant additions, revisions, and appendices. Would also appreciate a complete listing, in alphabetical order, of those parties deemed to have sufficient command of the aforementioned language to correct community members' use of the language in an open fora environment. http://www.thefreedictionary.com/issue Always liked you, jota, don't allow yourself to get swallowed by the machine that is AG&E.

There is no "Issue"with the burnout skill,only players have "issues" with this skill.
That's what jota is saying.The GM's nor the devs don't give a flying flip.  

Dude don't plagarize my words for you're agenda.Burnout skill is fine the way it is and please reword lame tiered,that's my post not yours.  

Gudmugly wrote:

Booya you used "can the tiers get any lamer" in your thread description. I'd say Korosh's use of the term to describe the thread is valid. Aeria fouled out a long time ago for me. Too much stuff to state my distaste for this game. The only reason to log on is all my wonderful friends and guildies. Without them I'd have deleted my chars long ago.

Dude did you even click on the links?
Those 2 links are my posts and I don't appreciate him using my links for his agendas or complaints or crybaby boohoo, change the game attitude.  

Booya39 wrote:

CJcarbon1 wrote: jotasnake wrote: You can't use the word "issue" when its just your opinion on a matter.   LOL! I am hereby placing a formal request for a certified true copy of AG&E's "Allowable Use Of The English Language" document, complete with all relevant additions, revisions, and appendices. Would also appreciate a complete listing, in alphabetical order, of those parties deemed to have sufficient command of the aforementioned language to correct community members' use of the language in an open fora environment. http://www.thefreedictionary.com/issue Always liked you, jota, don't allow yourself to get swallowed by the machine that is AG&E.   There is no "Issue"with the burnout skill,only players have "issues" with this skill. That's what jota is saying.The GM's nor the devs don't give a flying flip.

"is·sue
4.
a. A point or matter of discussion, debate, or dispute" <-- taken from my link that you obviously felt yourself above clicking.
And for the record, if jota disagrees with what I said, jota can say so... He doesn't need someone running interference for him.  

CJcarbon1 wrote:

Booya39 wrote: CJcarbon1 wrote: jotasnake wrote: You can't use the word "issue" when its just your opinion on a matter.   LOL! I am hereby placing a formal request for a certified true copy of AG&E's "Allowable Use Of The English Language" document, complete with all relevant additions, revisions, and appendices. Would also appreciate a complete listing, in alphabetical order, of those parties deemed to have sufficient command of the aforementioned language to correct community members' use of the language in an open fora environment. http://www.thefreedictionary.com/issue Always liked you, jota, don't allow yourself to get swallowed by the machine that is AG&E.   There is no "Issue"with the burnout skill,only players have "issues" with this skill. That's what jota is saying.The GM's nor the devs don't give a flying flip.   "is·sue 4. a. A point or matter of discussion, debate, or dispute" <-- taken from my link that you obviously felt yourself above clicking. And for the record, if jota disagrees with what I said, jota can say so... He doesn't need someone running interference for him.

CJ you took my statement too literal, what booya said was kinda what i was trying to say. While you may consider it an issue, because you do not agree with it and want it changed, others don't share your opinion, so its really just a concern from a certain ammount of players, not a general issue, if i made myself a bit clearer now. If some players have concerns about a specific thing of the game they can make a topic and explain their points as it was done on that topic you linked, theres no need to keep hammering on it saying "hey this issue was not adressed, do something" because there isn't anything broken, there isn't anything critical, the skill is working as the devs intended it to work, complaining that it shouldn't be that way is a whole diferent thing, is a suggestion AGE can make and the devs may or may not decide to follow it, but by not following it doesn't mean your concerns about it weren't heard. Most people believe those kind of topics are ignored but they are not, GMs are quite aware.

A bit late already but i hope i was bit clearer now >.>  

Like i said you are taking my words way too literally. I do not have any power to be making such demands nor am i trying to, it was just an expression that you shouldn't use that word to classify those concerns some players are having.

So i'm sorry if you misunderstood what i was trying to say.  

Gudmugly wrote:

Booya you used "can the tiers get any lamer" in your thread description. I'd say Korosh's use of the term to describe the thread is valid. Aeria fouled out a long time ago for me. Too much stuff to state my distaste for this game. The only reason to log on is all my wonderful friends and guildies. Without them I'd have deleted my chars long ago.

Dude did you even click on the links?
Those 2 links are my posts and I don't appreciate him using my links for his agendas or complaints or crybaby boohoo, change the game attitude.