Author Message

xcelsa808

Rank 0
Joined
10 Oct 2012
Posts
13
Location
Italy
PostedNov 10, 2012 8:06 pm

who's the best pvp level 60 sage on quill??

just wondering...
Advertisement

jerrywijaya

Rank 1
jerrywijaya
Joined
07 Dec 2010
Posts
267
Location
Singapore
PostedNov 10, 2012 8:17 pm
lol you're lv 60 sage?

yup. dat HP.

Altosk

Rank 2
Altosk
Joined
28 Dec 2009
Posts
593
Location
United States
PostedNov 11, 2012 1:12 am
doubtful that a sage is in 60 that could do half of the damage that I did when I was in 60.

xcelsa808

Rank 0
Joined
10 Oct 2012
Posts
13
Location
Italy
PostedNov 11, 2012 8:29 am
Im currently lvl 53.. saw a sage that took down 3 people in like 30 secs. Wondering if there are more stronger sages on 60 bracket

Posted By Aeria Mobile

Altosk

Rank 2
Altosk
Joined
28 Dec 2009
Posts
593
Location
United States
PostedNov 17, 2012 9:44 am
30 seconds is a long time to kill 3 people.

xcelsa808

Rank 0
Joined
10 Oct 2012
Posts
13
Location
Italy
PostedNov 19, 2012 8:54 am
I cconsider that fast since we sages don't have shadow slip to restealth while on combat and do sds to jump into some1 and avoid rangers's KB, and we don't have crit damage modifiers... I'm now at lvl 60 and I'm strugling to get a chain kill in a row..I might skip the bracket and jump into 70..ddnt know sage class is so hard to raise..-_-

Posted By Aeria Mobile

Altosk

Rank 2
Altosk
Joined
28 Dec 2009
Posts
593
Location
United States
PostedNov 19, 2012 10:02 am
Sage class takes all talents, all masteries, hammers, staves, and relics. Sage/mystic is very easy to mess up. you need alot of Fame from factions for talents, you need Ancient Talents for 70

30 seconds is slow. EXTREMELY slow. I could level entire teams in a few hits on my sage in 60.
Dual stun in 60 is a horrible idea. its effective, but in arena that takes waaay too much time. stun and 58 crit hammer kills people more.

I don't want to seem mean, but our class only gets harder 60+. If you can't handle it. I think its time to play a new class instead

Display posts from previous:   Sort by: