How would you rate Aeria Games Service?

5 (Excellent)
17%51 Votes
4
14%42 Votes
3
17%51 Votes
2
13%37 Votes
1 (Poor)
36%103 Votes
Total Votes :: 284 Votes
Author Message

conspiracyofone

Rank 2
conspiracyofone
Joined
14 Jun 2011
Posts
557
Location
Finland
PostedJun 26, 2012 8:15 pm
asruss00 wrote:
Voted a 1 yet again. The negligence that AGE has showed for its customers is repulsive. Five days passed and did not receive any updates on the servers network issues and when we finally did get a response they began deleting posts on the thread because people were expressing their feelings. No ToS were broken yet again and peoples comments were being deleted.  


Naaaaw, Aeria would never do that. ;C

asruss00 wrote:
Reason 4: NO DEDICATED GM TO DWO!  


We need one -o- And the GMs could interact on the forums too... Only see them posting promotions and sometimes derping in the SB.

Miggoh.PG1 @_@
Advertisement

gcr7

Rank 3
gcr7
Joined
23 Jul 2008
Posts
930
Location
setubal Portugal
PostedJun 26, 2012 8:18 pm
I was trying to stay out of this because i've known andaro for a long time, but since peechu stepped in i'll just say it.

The idea of taking GS'es , which are supposed to be experienced players, and take their opinions regarding new content into consideration is wonderful. Only problem is, what GS are you listening to, Andaro has barely logged on his toon for the past month, if he did was on an empty subserver and he's afk all the time, because me and no1 have seen him.

As for targeting, we aren't targeting anyone, since he's the one going into every post, we are aiming at something and he's putting himself in the way.

I do also believe GS'es are part of Aeria's service, so it counts as feedback.



Do yourself a favor, if you don't want to take his gs away, at least stop listening to him, just doing that would improve LC a lot.

mrdolphin

Rank 2
Joined
12 Aug 2008
Posts
438
Location
Baltimore United States
PostedJun 26, 2012 9:46 pm
I voted a 4.
The network issues are annoying but I don't know the reason of why it's happening and what resources AGE has (people/skill/equipment etc) to fix it.

I do like AGE's tiered spender and their help desk is very quick to answer my tickets (always have). I do wonder why tiered spenders are only the weekends. I cant recall if it's always been like this.

@Eden Eternal

Lvl 7X
Warrior(DPS)/Thief/MA/BD/Samurai/Ranger/Engi
YT channel

faely

GameSage: Last Chaos
faely
Joined
13 Oct 2008
Posts
1771
Location
oregon United States
PostedJun 26, 2012 9:55 pm
Well, at the risk of getting flamed myself, I'm just going to point out that the forum rules don't allow flaming against any specific individual or group. Not GM's, not GS's, not a fellow player. That's the reason you're being asked to keep that specific feedback to an RT where it belongs. Nothing more, nothing less. No one said don't give your feedback on an individual, this just isn't the place for it, that's all : )

Panderp.

Rank 4
Panderp.
Joined
27 Apr 2012
Posts
2229
Location
The Moon Brazil
PostedJun 26, 2012 10:03 pm
faely wrote:
Well, at the risk of getting flamed myself, I'm just going to point out that the forum rules don't allow flaming against any specific individual or group. Not GM's, not GS's, not a fellow player. That's the reason you're being asked to keep that specific feedback to an RT where it belongs. Nothing more, nothing less. No one said don't give your feedback on an individual, this just isn't the place for it, that's all : )  

well I'm not too sure about that. If I say I play Dynasty Warriors Online and the promotion handout is bad or the GM tickets aren't good or whatever, I am basically pointing to the DWO GM team right? but yet that kind of stuff is exactly what people post for feedback. Maybe naming someone outright is not ok, but vaguely saying a certain someone in this game should be fine?

asruss00

Rank 3
asruss00
Joined
02 Dec 2009
Posts
1477
Location
Gangnam Style Korea, South
PostedJun 26, 2012 10:09 pm
Panderp. wrote:
faely wrote:
Well, at the risk of getting flamed myself, I'm just going to point out that the forum rules don't allow flaming against any specific individual or group. Not GM's, not GS's, not a fellow player. That's the reason you're being asked to keep that specific feedback to an RT where it belongs. Nothing more, nothing less. No one said don't give your feedback on an individual, this just isn't the place for it, that's all : )  

well I'm not too sure about that. If I say I play Dynasty Warriors Online and the promotion handout is bad or the GM tickets aren't good or whatever, I am basically pointing to the DWO GM team right? but yet that kind of stuff is exactly what people post for feedback. Maybe naming someone outright is not ok, but vaguely saying a certain someone in this game should be fine?  


This exactly.

faely

GameSage: Last Chaos
faely
Joined
13 Oct 2008
Posts
1771
Location
oregon United States
PostedJun 26, 2012 10:11 pm
Panderp. wrote:
faely wrote:
Well, at the risk of getting flamed myself, I'm just going to point out that the forum rules don't allow flaming against any specific individual or group. Not GM's, not GS's, not a fellow player. That's the reason you're being asked to keep that specific feedback to an RT where it belongs. Nothing more, nothing less. No one said don't give your feedback on an individual, this just isn't the place for it, that's all : )  

well I'm not too sure about that. If I say I play Dynasty Warriors Online and the promotion handout is bad or the GM tickets aren't good or whatever, I am basically pointing to the DWO GM team right? but yet that kind of stuff is exactly what people post for feedback. Maybe naming someone outright is not ok, but vaguely saying a certain someone in this game should be fine?  


Well, no. If you play X game and you say you don't like the promos, you're talking about the promos. If you say your tickets aren't being handled well, then that's what you're talking about...the ticket handling. Yes, obviously, it goes back to whatever people are working on those things, but you're talking about the issue, not someone specific.

Someone mentioned "a GS from LC goes into other games' shoutboxes". (that's a paraphrase) That's pretty generic. That's ok. Specific feedback about that individual belongs in an RT.

asruss00

Rank 3
asruss00
Joined
02 Dec 2009
Posts
1477
Location
Gangnam Style Korea, South
PostedJun 26, 2012 10:19 pm
faely wrote:
Panderp. wrote:
faely wrote:
Well, at the risk of getting flamed myself, I'm just going to point out that the forum rules don't allow flaming against any specific individual or group. Not GM's, not GS's, not a fellow player. That's the reason you're being asked to keep that specific feedback to an RT where it belongs. Nothing more, nothing less. No one said don't give your feedback on an individual, this just isn't the place for it, that's all : )  

well I'm not too sure about that. If I say I play Dynasty Warriors Online and the promotion handout is bad or the GM tickets aren't good or whatever, I am basically pointing to the DWO GM team right? but yet that kind of stuff is exactly what people post for feedback. Maybe naming someone outright is not ok, but vaguely saying a certain someone in this game should be fine?  


Well, no. If you play X game and you say you don't like the promos, you're talking about the promos. If you say your tickets aren't being handled well, then that's what you're talking about...the ticket handling. Yes, obviously, it goes back to whatever people are working on those things, but you're talking about the issue, not someone specific.

Someone mentioned "a GS from LC goes into other games' shoutboxes". (that's a paraphrase) That's pretty generic. That's ok. Specific feedback about that individual belongs in an RT.
 


The GS is helping the GMs provide a service by helping them out. So giving feedback for a specific individual should be allowed as long as there is no flame about it. ToS doesnt state we arent allowd to mention a persons name or give a person feedback. It says pretty much we just arent allowed to flame or call out.

masterkoyote

Rank 0
masterkoyote
Joined
25 Oct 2010
Posts
20
Location
Waynesboro United States
PostedJun 26, 2012 10:26 pm

Feedback

For corporate management and middle management
This isnt a good idea given the bad blood from the few of us that are here from way back. Additionally it gives a forum for individual complaints rather than a general "here is what we have a problem with".

I generally and always give the rating as a 1 for service. This is usually followed by people defending X GM or X GS, but the GM and GS's aren't really the problems. In fact in most cases we feel sorry for them, which is pathetic in and of itself, but we know the problem is higher up the chain.


Priority to the company should be making money. Customers should never even remotely sense this, we feel it every day.

Under staffing and under training of the people that are dealing with the customers. This includes GM's and GS's but they are the least of the issue. Ticket response emails are getting better, but response time is only better as there are less complaints because most of your customer base has given up on Aeria as a whole. Your upper and middle management is the problem, its such a problem that we see it and we don't even work there. A complete retraining, or removal is needed.

The US is in a recession/depression the prices Aeria charges reflect a silicon valley 1980's income in a country that has over 60% of its citizens making less than they were before 2008. This is one of the many disconnects with the customer base that has never been addressed. More over this has been quick fixed repeatedly by sales etc rather than a longer term planning, even for the quarter of year. When pricing items that are only created virtually remember that McDonalds is a bigger corporation than Saks Fifth Avenue for a reason, people spend more in small amounts rather than large, and a free to play game does not hold many Saks customers. You have set yourselves to cater to 1% of the customer base available, no wonder your not making sales.

Quality Control, there is none. The game when it first came out until 2009 had a phenomenal start. Bad management, releasing of the core game to hackers, legal mishandling regarding gold sellers, as well as other miscellaneous things along the way have crippled this part of the company to the point of no return. Again no long term planning has made the company play catch up with a moving train that you will never catch.

We have all fallen for the mystery boxes, scalable upgrading of items, and scalable winning scams, once in a while was cute, but the newness has worn off and the winning ratio needs to be improved so it isnt so blatant that you are trying to increase sales. The general thought on your end needs to be that sales have increased, not that you are giving the store away. We talk amongst ourselves and compare notes on who wins what, the more these give out items that are worth less than we paid the less we spend, and the less we play until a downward spiral is made off of the game. This is more so with upgrading of armor and weapons than anything else. It was expected to increase the fail ratio before the introduction of Master Stones, now that they are out and accepted, your fail ratio on upgrading needs to improve dramatically. As it stands your AP purchase of roughly 50 USD will not guarantee an item going to even +15. We do the math and with multiple armors , weapons back packs and soon to be wings, we are looking at currently 5 armor and one wep, to buy AP to upgrade it would be 300 USD per set, not including Master stones and other items needed for upgrading. Add this with standard leveling playing etc, That is more than the average household has in expendable income. Research this for verification.




Currently what is generally agreed by most of the customer base are the following:

More AP items to buy at lower prices, especially Vanity type of items, Vanity section is one tenth of what it should be. People like to be around like people in there own unique way, with individualized pets. The fact that you have not capitalized on this is just unfathomably unforgivable.

Glitches fixed that are not costing you money but are causing the users issues. Customers should always feel as though they come first. Even though we know we do not, we do not like our noses rubbed in it. Fixing a glitch that is costing you money takes the servers down, while a wall glitch or pet glitch has taken over 8 months to fix, if at all is just one of many reasons to leave you.

Your monthly AP purchasing and multiple accounts are set up to be manipulated. Get over it, you should use this to your advantage, not punish those that have taken matters into there own hands to keep playing the game despite you, rather than play with you.

Daily something. Besides attendance there needs to be a reason to log into here every day. We try to amuse ourselves, but we have dwindled down to so few. Something to look forward to would be nice, even if its an item that lasts that day and disappears at the end of the day, non trade able etc.

When you say something do it. Do not go back on your word, if we cannot trust you we will not give you our money. This merge is a prime example, it should have gone through, and add the additional 4 characters back after the fix rather than disappoint the majority of the players by delaying and in turn appearing week manipulated by a few of the players and indecisive. Additionally we read the German and Korean server notes, so we know what you have the capability of doing, and know that you are behind them a great deal.


Update and organize your forums, your place is such a mess that I come up with posts from 2008 for something i am looking for now.

The fact that we have to go to Lastchaosinfo.wetpaint.com to get the best and most accurate information about your game says that it is up to the players and not the company to put out a workable model of how to play the game. In other words the players care more about the players than the person we are handing our money to. At least hire a person to make a playing guide that we can follow, hopefully to include new updates that are on the way.

Advertising, due to your inability to keep players playing, we need new blood. spend some of your money advertising what a wonderful game you used to be, and will hopefully be again.

Currently there are over 200 different Last Chaos hack servers that are available, some are better than this for instant gratification, and a month or so of fun play before you end up with nothing. You should have a couple of people playing these, making notes of what is good and incorporate that or something like that into your game.

Gold Sellers, you seem to be banning people with money rather than closing down the servers and companies that are selling your gold. The methodology should be to take the gold and keep the paying customer.

Im tired, and there is more, but this should give you the general consensus from my part of the worlds. And before the Haters gonna Hate on this, remember that I wont respond so say what you will to the empty echo.

seaotters

Rank 3
seaotters
Joined
19 May 2008
Posts
1191
Location
Taiwan
PostedJun 26, 2012 11:10 pm   Last edited by seaotters on Jun 27, 2012 5:15 pm. Edited 1 time in total
AriaSaitcho wrote:
LO Forum, now with nothing fun to do while we wait: All games locked and removed, all future games will be locked and removed.
 


LOL? What a legitimate reason to give them such a low score. I'm sure that has made a huge impact on your life.

But.. seems like DWO's going through the same that Domo went through.. since you guys mentioned having no full time GM ]:

Not to mention that since the game's closing announcement, there has not been a single maintenance. Though... there were regular weekend promos. So much greed and laziness.

So.. my score from last month will be the same for this month. If only I could vote lower than a 1. Seems a lot more fitting.
Display posts from previous:   Sort by: