SF's gameplay is better.

What everyone says SF owns AVA

You do realize you ask this in the Soldier Front section of the forums, right?

SF.Sound wrote:

Kight.Slayer wrote: All you members who have played this game . . . would you rather play A.V.A. or Soldier Front, and why?   Soldier front better gameplay

Let me put t this way, I've been playing SF for 5 years, I've logged onto AVA 5 times.

AVA is more for casual gamers who are thrilled by graphics.

SF is for people who don't mind outdated graphics but appreciate the unique amazing gameplay which you can keep building upon to become really good.

Soldier front is hard to get onto ; like any game when you first start you suck. and since USF doesn't have new people join... all trainees have to go play with the "pros"..

Soldier front Does have better Game play and I think the fact that it's slow paced, unlike other FPS games I like a lot.

gunfobia wrote:

Soldier Front require skills and strategy.AVA is just an ordinary FPS online game.

+1

I preffer Soldier Front

i have been playing SF for 5 years, and out of 100's and 100's of games on Ps2, Xbox, PS3, Xbox 360, and PC SF is the only game i have kept playing from the time i started.