Author Message

TommyMF

Rank 0
Joined
14 Feb 2012
Posts
7
Location
United States
PostedMar 23, 2012 9:08 am
I must respectfully disagree sir. The FPS in SF is still noticeably lower than almost any other FPS and the latency difference between players is much more pronounced. I have no lag issues on my side of things, besides rare spiking because of my slow wireless connection. The game was fantastic, as far as lag is concerned, for the first several months I played in 2007.

If you didn't play it that long ago, you will have no clue what I mean.
Advertisement

eudeku

Rank 0
Joined
13 Dec 2010
Posts
34
Location
Germany
PostedMar 24, 2012 7:30 am
SF > AVA

Scrimming on sf is much more fun than on AVA. Scrimming = 5v5 clan battle (for those who dont unterstand that).

kjenk19

Rank 0
Joined
15 Feb 2012
Posts
1
Location
Bundaberg Australia
PostedMar 26, 2012 6:14 pm
Soldier Front, unique, skill make difference, easier controls
A.V.A., hard to throw nades (thats why i quit), hard to findway around game (find weapon shop/games etc)

Kight.Slayer

Rank 2
Kight.Slayer
Joined
31 May 2010
Posts
640
Location
United States
PostedMar 26, 2012 6:17 pm
kjenk19 wrote:
Soldier Front, unique, skill make difference, easier controls
A.V.A., hard to throw nades (thats why i quit), hard to findway around game (find weapon shop/games etc)  
You quit AVA because it is hard for you to throw grenades?

SF.Sound

Rank 0
SF.Sound
Joined
14 Feb 2012
Posts
140
Location
Netherlands
PostedMar 27, 2012 1:16 am
Kight.Slayer wrote:
kjenk19 wrote:
Soldier Front, unique, skill make difference, easier controls
A.V.A., hard to throw nades (thats why i quit), hard to findway around game (find weapon shop/games etc)  
You quit AVA because it is hard for you to throw grenades?  


ROFL copter

TehLilium

Rank 0
TehLilium
Joined
01 Feb 2012
Posts
43
Location
Germany
PostedMar 29, 2012 11:25 pm
Soldier front because better gameplay

Ava is like cod but worse than COD

with the gameplay and Hitbox's

and soldier front is much easier and i played soldier front like about 3 years ago and cant move on to AVA ...

‹3 Soul Eater !

lCharizardl

Rank 0
lCharizardl
Joined
05 Jan 2012
Posts
19
Location
United States
PostedMar 30, 2012 1:03 am
I prefer SF over AVA, having played both. I enjoy the way recoil works, the way the maps are set up, the way the physics work, etc.

It's a very dated game, but that doesn't really bother me- I enjoy CSS as well.

HKmaster

Rank 0
HKmaster
Joined
31 Jan 2009
Posts
3
Location
Banlieue 13, Netherlands
PostedMar 30, 2012 4:03 am

Soldier Front

I have played Soldier Front About 3 years. It is a very proffesional game! AVA is just better Graphics.

auximi

Rank 0
Joined
13 Feb 2012
Posts
2
Location
Scarborough Canada
PostedApr 07, 2012 9:04 pm
Hi,

So if you're wondering which game to play, keep this in mind. A.V.A has 10x better graphics than Soldier Front does. Both do have good gameplay and teamwork involved, however in my opinion, I think Soldier Front would take it in gameplay. I mean, SF has so little but so much to offer.

I for one have only played A.V.A 3 times, but I can see it's major difference between SF.

But seeing how you can, why not try both and see which one you like? ^_^

.Heretic.

Rank 0
.Heretic.
Joined
07 Apr 2012
Posts
16
Location
Canada
PostedApr 07, 2012 11:42 pm
I've been playing SF ever since it came out, i tried AVA like 6 months ago. I have to say that AVA is too easy for me :/ In AVA anyone can go around spraying, but if you did that in SF you'd be 0-30 ^.^
Display posts from previous:   Sort by: